Google 搜索联盟

2011年9月12日星期一

ns231, ns259.dnsever.com 의 IP주소 변경

등록 2011-08-27 21:04:59 조회 1325
이름 DNS에버

안녕하세요. DNS에버입니다.

ns231.dnsever.comns259.dnsever.com 의 IP주소가 변경되었습니다.

ns231.dnsever.com
기존 IP주소: 125.141.231.179 에서
새로운 IP주소 183.111.20.231
로 변경되었습니다.

ns259.dnsever.com
기존 IP주소: 121.254.154.233 에서
새로운 IP주소 183.111.20.232
로 변경되었습니다.

네임서버의 IP주소가 변경되어도 기존에 도메인에 대한 네임서버를 설정해놓으신
분들은 도메인등록업체에서 도메인에 대한 네임서버를 변경할 필요는 없습니다.

다만, 신규로 도메인을 dnsever 로 설정하시는 분들은
도메인등록업체에서 네임서버에 대한 IP주소를 요구하는 경우가 있는데
그때 새로운 IP주소를 입력하시면 됩니다.

감사합니다.

2011年9月11日星期日

Google App Engine Leaving Preview

Dear Google App Engine Application Administrator,

In May at Google I/O we announced that Google App Engine would be
leaving Preview status later this year. As part of Google's long-term
commitment to App Engine, we are also updating our policies, pricing
and support model to reflect its status as a fully supported Google
product. We plan to roll this out in the second half of September but
we wanted to let you know what this will mean for you and your App
Engine applications. Please be aware that the timeline may change, but
you can keep up to date on our progress on the App Engine blog. We
plan to send a second email once the new pricing is in effect.

For all paid applications using the High Replication Datastore (HRD),
we will be introducing a new 99.95% uptime SLA. The current draft form
of the SLA can be found at http://code.google.com/appengine/sla.html.
For apps not using HRD, we will also soon release a tool that will
assist with the migration from Master/Slave (M/S) to HRD (you can sign
up to be in the Trusted Tester for the tool here:
http://goo.gl/3jrXu). We would like to emphasize that the SLA only
applies to applications that have both signed up to be a paid App and
use the HRD Datastore.
App Engine has a 3 year deprecation policy. This policy applies to the
entire App Engine platform with the exception of "trusted tester" and
"experimental" APIs. This is intended to allow you to develop your app
with confidence knowing that you will have sufficient notice if we
plan to make any backward-incompatible API changes that will impact
your application.
We will be updating the Terms of Service with language more geared
towards businesses. A draft of the new ToS can be found at
http://code.google.com/appengine/updated_terms.html.
We are introducing new Premier Accounts that will have access to
Operational Support, invoice-based billing, and allow companies to
create as many applications as they need for $500 per account per
month (plus usage fees). If you are interested in a Premier Account,
please contact us at appengine_premier_requests@google.com.

We will be moving to a new pricing structure that ensures ongoing
support of App Engine. Details of the new structure can be found at
http://www.google.com/enterprise/cloud/appengine/pricing.html. This
includes lowering the free quotas for all Apps. Almost all
applications will be billed more under the new pricing. Once App
Engine leaves preview this pricing will immediately go into effect,
but we've done a few things to ease the transition:

If you sign up for billing or update your budget between now and
October 31st we will give you a $50 credit.
In order to help you understand your future costs we are now providing
a side by side comparison of your old bill to what your new bill would
be. You can find these in your Admin Console under "Billing history"
by clicking on any of your "Usage Reports". Please review this
information. It's important that you study this projected billing and
begin any application tuning that you want to be in effect prior to
the new bill taking effect.
We have created an Optimization Article to help you determine how you
could optimize your application to reduce your costs under the new
model.
We have created a Billing FAQ based on the questions many of our
customers have had about the new pricing model.
The new pricing model charges are based on the number of instances you
have running. This is largely dictated by the App Engine Scheduler,
but for Python we will not be supporting concurrent requests until
Python 2.7 is live. Because of this, and to allow all developers to
adjust to concurrent requests, we have reduced the price of all
Frontend Instance Hours by 50% until November 20th.
Finally, if you have any additional questions or concerns please
contact us at appengine_updated_pricing@google.com.

In order to graduate from Preview status, we've made and continue to
make large investments in platform features, scalability, and
stability that your applications will benefit from. Thank you for your
support, commitment, and feedback on App Engine as it has developed.
We look forward to working with you for years to come!

Thank You,
The App Engine Team

© 2011 Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043

You have received this mandatory email service announcement to update
you about important changes to your Google App Engine account.

2011年2月15日星期二

Домен ****.NET.RU: срок регистрации заканчивается 16-APR-2011

RU域名结束免费,正式开始收费了。
domain registration renewal fee is 14.2 USD


An English version of this message is contained below.

---------------------------------english---------------------------------
Dear Madam/Sir,

The period of PCSTAR.NET.RU domain registration ends on 16-APR-2011. The
administrator of the domain is Accountants Inc, contract XXXXXXX/NIC-D.

If you plan to further use the PCSTAR.NET.RU domain name, you should renew the
registration for the next year, that is pay the "PCSTAR.NET.RU domain
registration renewal" service fee. The service fee is 14.2 USD (including
taxes).

If the fee is not paid till 16-APR-2011, then from 17-APR-2011 the domain
delegation will be suspended, and after 16-MAY-2011 the domain will be deleted,
and anybody will be able to register it. Balance of the personal account of the
contract XXXXXXX/NIC-D as of 15-FEB-2011 is: 0 USD.

If there is not enough money in the personal account of your contract, then you
should make a payment. You can choose the most convenient way to make payments
on http://www.nic.ru/en/index.html in the "Prices and Payments" - "Payment
Procedures" section. Please pay special attention to immediate ways of making
payments.

In the "Manage your account" - "Services" - "Renew services" section on
http://www.nic.ru/en/index.html you can:

- learn about services, currently needing to be renewed

- cancel domain name registration renewal. In that case domain name expiration
notices will not be sent any further, money will not be charged off the
Personal account, the domain will not be renewed

- give your approval for service renewal

- renew the domain name registration in advance, without waiting for
16-APR-2011. In that case the PCSTAR.NET.RU domain registration will be
instantly renewed till 16-APR-2012.

You can get information about your personal account balance and payments on
http://www.nic.ru/en/index.html in the "Manage your account" - "Payment" -
"Account balance" section.

If there is enough money on the account of the contract XXXXXXX/NIC-D, then on
08-APR-2011, 8 days before the payment period ends, the 14.2 USD sum will be
blocked, and the 15-APR-2011 will be charged off, after that the domain
registration will be renewed for the next accounting period till 16-APR-2012.

Order of service renewal is described on
http://www.nic.ru/dns/docs/en/prolong.html

2011年2月14日星期一

pipni.cz 再次宕机

更新:据pipni官方说VPS暂停是由于受到来自海外的大规模DOS攻击.
离上次pipni宕机 没几天,今天VPS又DOWN了(时间是上午)到现在都还没有恢复。

频繁的DOWN机和申请人数急剧增加有关,各个服务器都处于爆满状态.
曾经看到pipni的monitoring统计信息,母鸡Load Averages持续都在100以上(4核CPU负载超过20就已经算高了),磁盘使用也已经超过90%了。

pipni vps目前已经关闭免费,注册页面已删,应该可以稳定了。
下面的申请数量不成比例,所有系统总和都没Debian数量多。
Debian  1619
Slackware  229
Ubuntu  177
Gentoo  60
ISPconfig (WebAdmin + PhpMyAdmin + WebMail + AwStats)  52
Celkem  2137

Linux系统我还是偏爱Slackware。

2011年1月29日星期六

突尼斯网络监管负责人接受采访

《连线》采访了突尼斯网络监管机构Tunisian Internet Agency(ATI,Agence tunisienne d'Internet的缩写)的局长Kamel Saadaoui。 他声称,在去年12月革命开始时,政府黑名单中的网站数量迅速攀升。
至于本阿里为什么没有采用类似埃及的断网和断电话的措施,他认为可能是本阿里对局势预估不足,或者不知道他能够关闭互联网。 ATI在其存在的15年里,在审查互联网和窃取活跃分子电邮帐号方面臭名远扬。网络和电邮流量都要经过ATI的办公室。Saadaoui担任ATI局长一 职已有3年,他坚称只是服从政府命令,现在旧政府被推翻,新政府上台,他也将遵循新的政策,促进互联网的开放。他说,“我们只是计算机和电子工程师,不是 警察。”不是他们决定屏蔽哪个网站,他们并不知道你有没有博客。换句话说,不要谴责他们,他们只是干活的。起初黑名单只有300个左右的网站,但随着网民 数量的增长,被屏蔽网站数量到去年11月超过2000。当政府开始封杀代理服务器时,黑名单迅速增至数千,其中大约一千是政治性网站,其余则是代理服务 器。去年12月革命爆发后,ATI与黑客们展开了一场竞争,匿名组织DDoS ATI的网站,但Saadaoui表示他们的主服务器和网络没受到太大影响。在本阿里逃走后,黑名单并没有完全消失,Saadaoui承诺黑名单中的网站 全是色情、儿童色情、裸体和宣扬仇恨,只使用URL过滤。

方滨兴担任GFW主任一职已有3年,他坚称只是遵守政府命令,现在旧政府被推翻,新政府上台,他也将遵循新的政策,促进互联网的开放。他说,“我们只是计算机和电子工程师,不是决策者。”换句话说,不要谴责他们,他们只是干活的。

2011年1月25日星期二

互联网自由之花重新在突尼斯绽放

1月14日突尼斯独裁总统本·阿里抛弃了他统治了23年的国家,乘飞机逃往沙特阿拉伯避难。这一戏剧性的变化是在短短一个月内发生的。许多人将这场革命称之为"Twitter革命"或"Wikileaks革命"。 这些似是而非的结论掩盖了真相,确实Twitter、博客、Facebook、匿名组织和Wikileaks起了推波助澜之力, 但革命的真正原因是突尼斯国内的高失业率、腐败猖獗,以及食品价格上涨;导火索则是一位受过大学教育的26岁男子Mohamed Bouazizi在去年12月17日,因为警察部门没收他没有执照的蔬菜水果摊,以自焚抗议。这一绝望的举动点燃了人们的怒火,走上街头抗议的民众与警察 和革命卫队发生了流血冲突。其中,互联网在组织抗议上起了十分重要的作用,向世界传播了抗议新闻和照片。突尼斯政府显然没有成熟的网络控制手段,在抗议爆 发之后,它匆匆屏蔽了大量批评政府的网站和博客,接着又笨拙的用JS脚本试图窃取异议者的Gmail和Facebook帐号(EFF本月呼吁安装它的HTTPS Everywhere),随后它逮捕了多名博客和突尼斯海盗党成员。它无力控制网络的弱点进一步暴露:匿名组织发起了攻击政府网站的"突尼斯行动",而Wikileaks泄漏的有关总统家族腐败的美国外交电文则进一步加大了民众的怒火,抗议浪潮一波高过一波,最终导致了政府的垮台。 突尼斯的革命之火正向周围的阿拉伯世界蔓延,埃及和毛里塔尼亚等国的抗议者也开始采用了自焚这种极端手段表达愤怒

2011年1月21日星期五

IANA Report on the Delegation of the .KP Top-Level Domain

IANA Report on the Delegation of the .KP Top-Level Domain

Background

The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) function of ICANN, as part of the administrative tasks associated with management of the Domain Name System root zone, is responsible for receiving requests for the delegation and redelegation of top-level domains, investigating and reporting on the circumstances pertinent to those requests, and, when appropriate, implementing the redelegations.

In accordance with ICANN's performance of these functions, ICANN received a request for the delegation of the .KP top-level domain. This domain is designated for the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) in the ISO 3166-1 standard. The application was received on 26 January 2007, with supporting documentation received in the following month.

The DPRK is an East Asian country situated on the northern half of the Korean Peninsula with a population of approximately 23 million people. The .KP country code has never been delegated in the DNS root zone.

On 22 October 2004, ICANN received a letter from the Permanent Mission of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea to the United Nations, signed by Ambassador Songryol Han. The letter informed ICANN that the "DPRK Computer Center is assigned as the national network center and authorised to manage "KP" state domain by the government of the DPRK." This letter was not supported by any further documentation or any formal delegation request as required to properly instigate a request.

On 22 May 2006, ICANN received a letter from Jan Holtermann of the Korea Computer Center Europe (KCCE) in Berlin, Germany. The letter indicated that the Government of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea would be requesting the delegation of the .KP top-level domain. The letter went on to explain that the KCCE is an affiliate of the Korea Computer Center (KCC) in Pyongyang, DPRK, and that the KCCE will act as their official representative in the delegation matter "due to the difficult communication situation between North Korea and other countries."

On 31 July 2006, ICANN received a letter from the Permanent Mission of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea to the United Nations. The letter stated that the Government of the DPRK has designated the KCC to manage the .KP country code top-level domain.

On 22 August 2006, ICANN received a letter from the KCC, signed by Director Kim Chang Ryop. The letter requested that ICANN pursue the next step in the delegation process and referenced the government letter authorizing KCC as the administrator of the .KP top-level domain.

On 30 August 2006, ICANN received the same delegation request lodged via the IANA ticketing system. Upon initial review of the request, IANA staff provided the requestors with detailed instructions on the delegation process and requested additional supporting documentation. In addition, IANA staff asked the requestors to provide a completed template. IANA staff received the completed template but did not receive the requested additional documentation, even after several reminders for that documentation were sent. In accordance with standard procedure, the request was administratively closed on 1 December 2006 after the requestors did not provide the necessary documentation within the specified timeframe.

The applicant resubmitted the request to ICANN on 26 January 2007. Initially there was a misunderstanding about why the previous request was closed. IANA staff explained that it was following its normal process for closing the request after 30 calendar days if the requested information had not been tendered. The supporting documentation for the current request was submitted on 15 February 2007.

A delegation from KCCE, the proposed technical contact, visited the ICANN Offices on 13 May 2007. They were informed of the delegation process, and that the materials submitted in connection with the previous application, was currently under staff review. The delegation was advised that if further documentation or information were needed from the applicant, they would be advised.

The request under consideration seeks the delegation of .KP top-level domain to the Government of the People's Republic of Korea represented by the Korea Computer Center in Pyongyang, DPRK. The KCC is the DPRK government agency designated for the administration and development of information technology in the DPRK. It is proposed that Kim Chang Ryop, Vice President of Korea Computer Center, fill the administrative contact role, and that Jan Holtermann of KCC Europe GmbH fill the technical contact role.

The documentation provided in support of the delegation request includes an endorsement letter from the Permanent Mission of the DPRK to the United Nations, detailed information about the proposed sponsoring organization (KCC), policy and rules that have been established for managing the .KP top-level domain, and a description of the technical structure for operating the domain.

Evaluation Procedure

In its role as investigator of delegation and redelegation requests, IANA procedure is guided by the practices summarized in:

  • "Domain Name System Structure and Delegation" (RFC 1591). This document describes IANA's practices relating to delegations at its publication in 1994. See http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1591.txt

  • "Internet Domain Name System Structure and Delegation." (ICP-1). This document represents an update of the portions of RFC 1591 dealing with ccTLDs and reflects subsequent evolution of the policies followed by ICANN through May 1999. See http://www.icann.org/icp/icp1.htm.

  • The Governmental Advisory Committee Principles for Delegation and Administration of ccTLDs (GAC Principles). This document serve as "best practices" to guide governments in assuming proper roles with respect to the Internet's naming system. See http://www.icann.org/committees/gac/gac-cctldprinciples-23feb00.htm.

In considering the delegation or redelegation of a ccTLD, IANA staff seeks input from both the requesting party as well as from persons and/or organizations that may be significantly affected by the change, particularly those within the nation or territory to which the ccTLD is designated. As noted in ICP-1, the parties affected include the relevant government or public authority: "The desires of the government of a country with regard to delegation of a ccTLD are taken very seriously. The IANA will make them a major consideration in any TLD delegation/transfer discussions."

Taking these factors into consideration, the burden of proof required to permit a delegation involves determining facts that relate to the applicant's capacity to meet the following criteria:

  1. Operational and technical skills

    1. The prospective manager has the requisite skills to operate the TLD appropriately. (ICP-1 §a, RFC 1591 §3.5)
    2. There must be reliable, full-time IP connectivity to the nameservers and electronic mail connectivity to the operators; (ICP-1 §a; RFC 1591 §3.1)
    3. The manager must perform its duties in assigning domains and operating nameservers with technical competence (ICP-1 §d; RFC 1591 §3.5)
  2. Operator in country
    1. The prospective manager supervises and operates the domain name from within the country represented by the TLD; (ICP-1 §a; RFC 1591 §3.1)
    2. The prospective administrative contact must reside in the country represented by the TLD. (ICP-1 §a; RFC 1591 §3.1)
  3. Equitable treatment

    1. The prospective manager must be equitable and fair to all groups encompassed by the TLD that may request domain names (ICP-1 §c; RFC 1591 §3.3)
  4. Community/Governmental support

    1. The prospective manager has the requisite authority to operate the TLD appropriately, with the desire of the government taken very seriously. (ICP-1 §a, GAC Principles)
    2. Significantly interested parties in the domain should agree that the prospective manager is the appropriate party to receive the delegation (ICP-1 §a; RFC 1591 §3.4)

In meeting these criteria, the IANA staff requests information from the applicant. In summary, a request template is sought specifying the exact details of the delegation being sought in the root zone. In addition, IANA staff asks for various documentation describing: the views of the local Internet community on a change; the competencies and skills of the organisation to operate the registry; the legal authenticity, status and character of the proposed operator; and the nature of government support for the proposal.

After receiving these documents, IANA staff analyses the input it has received in relation to existing zone management procedures, seeking input from parties both related to as well as independent of the applying organization should the information provided by the applicant in their request be deficient.

Once all the documentation has been received, IANA staff will also perform various technical checks on the proposed operator's DNS infrastructure to ensure name servers are properly configured and are able to respond to queries for the top-level domain being requested. Should any anomalies be detected in the applicant's technical infrastructure, IANA will work with the applicant to address the issues.

Assuming all technical issues are resolved, IANA staff will compile a report, providing all relevant details regarding the applicant, its suitability for operating the top-level domain being requested, and any other information pertinent to the application and submit that report to ICANN's Board of Directors for its determination on whether to proceed with the request.

Evaluation

This report is being provided under the contract for performance of the IANA function between the United States Government and ICANN. Under that contract, ICANN performs the IANA function, which includes receiving delegation and redelegation requests concerning top-level domains, investigating the circumstances pertinent to those requests, and reporting on the requests. Pertaining to the obligations described in the evaluation procedure, in summary IANA staff has assessed the applicant's credentials to be as follows:

  • Operational and technical skills

    The operator will be the Korea Computer Center (KCC), which was founded on 24 October 1990. According to the documentation provided, the KCC is a state-owned entity, "responsible for the development and organization of the IT-Industry in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea" and considered to be the leading organization for information technology development. It is involved in several fields such as software development, research and training.

    The applicants provided fairly detailed information on the policies in place for operating the registry. They have also provided detailed description of the technical infrastructure regarding DNS, registry and whois services for the .KP ccTLD.

    The information available to IANA staff does not provide clear mechanisms for community input in the operation of the domain.

  • Operator in country

    The KCC is located in the DPRK, with the administrative contact as the Vice President of the KCC. IANA was informed that administrative control would reside at KCC within DPRK, whilst the technical operation of the zone would be performed by KCCE in Germany.

  • Fair and equitable treatment

    The applicant has made undertakings to IANA staff that registrations will be performed on a first-come first-served basis that is fair and equitable.

  • Governmental support

    The ICANN Government Advisory Committee Principles observes that the Internet's naming system is "a public resource … administered in the public or common interest." In general, ICANN's GAC recognizes that each government has the ultimate responsibility within its territory for its national public policy objectives, however in the case of a redelegation, this may be tempered by ICANN's responsibility to ensure the Internet DNS continues to provide an effective and interoperable global naming system.

    The Government of the DPRK, through its Permanent Mission to the United Nations, has been the initiator of the request, and actively supports the delegation. The Supporting Organisation has the full endorsement of the government.

  • Community sentiment

    Due to the current lack of development of the Internet in the country, it is difficult to give a clear assessment of the community. In its investigations, IANA staff has determined that Internet development in the country is limited and IANA staff has been unable to conduct an independent review of the local Internet community support.

    However, the KCC, as an arm of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and as a government agency, can reasonably be assumed to reliably represent the government's interest in performing the delegation as requested.

    Furthermore, the applicant has asserted it is appropriate that the Government is in the best position to distil the public interest given the limited deployment of Internet to date.

Recommendation

According to RFC 1591 and ICP-1, ICANN needs to respect the ability for a local Internet community, as well as local law and local government to make decisions concerning the operation of their country-code top-level domain.

Based upon our investigation, IANA staff believes that the applicant has met the basic criteria to support a delegation request. We find no reason not to recommend the introduction of the .KP domain into the DNS root zone.

IANA staff therefore concludes that the .KP domain should be delegated to the Korea Computer Center in accordance with their request.

Postscript: Board Resolution

On September 11, 2007 the Board of ICANN passed the following resolution:

Whereas, ICANN has received a request for the delegation of .KP to Korea Computer Center,

Whereas, ICANN has reviewed the request, and has determined that the proposed redelegation would be in the best interest of the local and global Internet communities,

It is hereby resolved (07.74), that the proposed delegation of the .KP domain to Korea Computer Center is approved.