Google 搜索联盟

2011年1月21日星期五

IANA Report on the Delegation of the .KP Top-Level Domain

IANA Report on the Delegation of the .KP Top-Level Domain

Background

The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) function of ICANN, as part of the administrative tasks associated with management of the Domain Name System root zone, is responsible for receiving requests for the delegation and redelegation of top-level domains, investigating and reporting on the circumstances pertinent to those requests, and, when appropriate, implementing the redelegations.

In accordance with ICANN's performance of these functions, ICANN received a request for the delegation of the .KP top-level domain. This domain is designated for the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) in the ISO 3166-1 standard. The application was received on 26 January 2007, with supporting documentation received in the following month.

The DPRK is an East Asian country situated on the northern half of the Korean Peninsula with a population of approximately 23 million people. The .KP country code has never been delegated in the DNS root zone.

On 22 October 2004, ICANN received a letter from the Permanent Mission of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea to the United Nations, signed by Ambassador Songryol Han. The letter informed ICANN that the "DPRK Computer Center is assigned as the national network center and authorised to manage "KP" state domain by the government of the DPRK." This letter was not supported by any further documentation or any formal delegation request as required to properly instigate a request.

On 22 May 2006, ICANN received a letter from Jan Holtermann of the Korea Computer Center Europe (KCCE) in Berlin, Germany. The letter indicated that the Government of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea would be requesting the delegation of the .KP top-level domain. The letter went on to explain that the KCCE is an affiliate of the Korea Computer Center (KCC) in Pyongyang, DPRK, and that the KCCE will act as their official representative in the delegation matter "due to the difficult communication situation between North Korea and other countries."

On 31 July 2006, ICANN received a letter from the Permanent Mission of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea to the United Nations. The letter stated that the Government of the DPRK has designated the KCC to manage the .KP country code top-level domain.

On 22 August 2006, ICANN received a letter from the KCC, signed by Director Kim Chang Ryop. The letter requested that ICANN pursue the next step in the delegation process and referenced the government letter authorizing KCC as the administrator of the .KP top-level domain.

On 30 August 2006, ICANN received the same delegation request lodged via the IANA ticketing system. Upon initial review of the request, IANA staff provided the requestors with detailed instructions on the delegation process and requested additional supporting documentation. In addition, IANA staff asked the requestors to provide a completed template. IANA staff received the completed template but did not receive the requested additional documentation, even after several reminders for that documentation were sent. In accordance with standard procedure, the request was administratively closed on 1 December 2006 after the requestors did not provide the necessary documentation within the specified timeframe.

The applicant resubmitted the request to ICANN on 26 January 2007. Initially there was a misunderstanding about why the previous request was closed. IANA staff explained that it was following its normal process for closing the request after 30 calendar days if the requested information had not been tendered. The supporting documentation for the current request was submitted on 15 February 2007.

A delegation from KCCE, the proposed technical contact, visited the ICANN Offices on 13 May 2007. They were informed of the delegation process, and that the materials submitted in connection with the previous application, was currently under staff review. The delegation was advised that if further documentation or information were needed from the applicant, they would be advised.

The request under consideration seeks the delegation of .KP top-level domain to the Government of the People's Republic of Korea represented by the Korea Computer Center in Pyongyang, DPRK. The KCC is the DPRK government agency designated for the administration and development of information technology in the DPRK. It is proposed that Kim Chang Ryop, Vice President of Korea Computer Center, fill the administrative contact role, and that Jan Holtermann of KCC Europe GmbH fill the technical contact role.

The documentation provided in support of the delegation request includes an endorsement letter from the Permanent Mission of the DPRK to the United Nations, detailed information about the proposed sponsoring organization (KCC), policy and rules that have been established for managing the .KP top-level domain, and a description of the technical structure for operating the domain.

Evaluation Procedure

In its role as investigator of delegation and redelegation requests, IANA procedure is guided by the practices summarized in:

  • "Domain Name System Structure and Delegation" (RFC 1591). This document describes IANA's practices relating to delegations at its publication in 1994. See http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1591.txt

  • "Internet Domain Name System Structure and Delegation." (ICP-1). This document represents an update of the portions of RFC 1591 dealing with ccTLDs and reflects subsequent evolution of the policies followed by ICANN through May 1999. See http://www.icann.org/icp/icp1.htm.

  • The Governmental Advisory Committee Principles for Delegation and Administration of ccTLDs (GAC Principles). This document serve as "best practices" to guide governments in assuming proper roles with respect to the Internet's naming system. See http://www.icann.org/committees/gac/gac-cctldprinciples-23feb00.htm.

In considering the delegation or redelegation of a ccTLD, IANA staff seeks input from both the requesting party as well as from persons and/or organizations that may be significantly affected by the change, particularly those within the nation or territory to which the ccTLD is designated. As noted in ICP-1, the parties affected include the relevant government or public authority: "The desires of the government of a country with regard to delegation of a ccTLD are taken very seriously. The IANA will make them a major consideration in any TLD delegation/transfer discussions."

Taking these factors into consideration, the burden of proof required to permit a delegation involves determining facts that relate to the applicant's capacity to meet the following criteria:

  1. Operational and technical skills

    1. The prospective manager has the requisite skills to operate the TLD appropriately. (ICP-1 §a, RFC 1591 §3.5)
    2. There must be reliable, full-time IP connectivity to the nameservers and electronic mail connectivity to the operators; (ICP-1 §a; RFC 1591 §3.1)
    3. The manager must perform its duties in assigning domains and operating nameservers with technical competence (ICP-1 §d; RFC 1591 §3.5)
  2. Operator in country
    1. The prospective manager supervises and operates the domain name from within the country represented by the TLD; (ICP-1 §a; RFC 1591 §3.1)
    2. The prospective administrative contact must reside in the country represented by the TLD. (ICP-1 §a; RFC 1591 §3.1)
  3. Equitable treatment

    1. The prospective manager must be equitable and fair to all groups encompassed by the TLD that may request domain names (ICP-1 §c; RFC 1591 §3.3)
  4. Community/Governmental support

    1. The prospective manager has the requisite authority to operate the TLD appropriately, with the desire of the government taken very seriously. (ICP-1 §a, GAC Principles)
    2. Significantly interested parties in the domain should agree that the prospective manager is the appropriate party to receive the delegation (ICP-1 §a; RFC 1591 §3.4)

In meeting these criteria, the IANA staff requests information from the applicant. In summary, a request template is sought specifying the exact details of the delegation being sought in the root zone. In addition, IANA staff asks for various documentation describing: the views of the local Internet community on a change; the competencies and skills of the organisation to operate the registry; the legal authenticity, status and character of the proposed operator; and the nature of government support for the proposal.

After receiving these documents, IANA staff analyses the input it has received in relation to existing zone management procedures, seeking input from parties both related to as well as independent of the applying organization should the information provided by the applicant in their request be deficient.

Once all the documentation has been received, IANA staff will also perform various technical checks on the proposed operator's DNS infrastructure to ensure name servers are properly configured and are able to respond to queries for the top-level domain being requested. Should any anomalies be detected in the applicant's technical infrastructure, IANA will work with the applicant to address the issues.

Assuming all technical issues are resolved, IANA staff will compile a report, providing all relevant details regarding the applicant, its suitability for operating the top-level domain being requested, and any other information pertinent to the application and submit that report to ICANN's Board of Directors for its determination on whether to proceed with the request.

Evaluation

This report is being provided under the contract for performance of the IANA function between the United States Government and ICANN. Under that contract, ICANN performs the IANA function, which includes receiving delegation and redelegation requests concerning top-level domains, investigating the circumstances pertinent to those requests, and reporting on the requests. Pertaining to the obligations described in the evaluation procedure, in summary IANA staff has assessed the applicant's credentials to be as follows:

  • Operational and technical skills

    The operator will be the Korea Computer Center (KCC), which was founded on 24 October 1990. According to the documentation provided, the KCC is a state-owned entity, "responsible for the development and organization of the IT-Industry in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea" and considered to be the leading organization for information technology development. It is involved in several fields such as software development, research and training.

    The applicants provided fairly detailed information on the policies in place for operating the registry. They have also provided detailed description of the technical infrastructure regarding DNS, registry and whois services for the .KP ccTLD.

    The information available to IANA staff does not provide clear mechanisms for community input in the operation of the domain.

  • Operator in country

    The KCC is located in the DPRK, with the administrative contact as the Vice President of the KCC. IANA was informed that administrative control would reside at KCC within DPRK, whilst the technical operation of the zone would be performed by KCCE in Germany.

  • Fair and equitable treatment

    The applicant has made undertakings to IANA staff that registrations will be performed on a first-come first-served basis that is fair and equitable.

  • Governmental support

    The ICANN Government Advisory Committee Principles observes that the Internet's naming system is "a public resource … administered in the public or common interest." In general, ICANN's GAC recognizes that each government has the ultimate responsibility within its territory for its national public policy objectives, however in the case of a redelegation, this may be tempered by ICANN's responsibility to ensure the Internet DNS continues to provide an effective and interoperable global naming system.

    The Government of the DPRK, through its Permanent Mission to the United Nations, has been the initiator of the request, and actively supports the delegation. The Supporting Organisation has the full endorsement of the government.

  • Community sentiment

    Due to the current lack of development of the Internet in the country, it is difficult to give a clear assessment of the community. In its investigations, IANA staff has determined that Internet development in the country is limited and IANA staff has been unable to conduct an independent review of the local Internet community support.

    However, the KCC, as an arm of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and as a government agency, can reasonably be assumed to reliably represent the government's interest in performing the delegation as requested.

    Furthermore, the applicant has asserted it is appropriate that the Government is in the best position to distil the public interest given the limited deployment of Internet to date.

Recommendation

According to RFC 1591 and ICP-1, ICANN needs to respect the ability for a local Internet community, as well as local law and local government to make decisions concerning the operation of their country-code top-level domain.

Based upon our investigation, IANA staff believes that the applicant has met the basic criteria to support a delegation request. We find no reason not to recommend the introduction of the .KP domain into the DNS root zone.

IANA staff therefore concludes that the .KP domain should be delegated to the Korea Computer Center in accordance with their request.

Postscript: Board Resolution

On September 11, 2007 the Board of ICANN passed the following resolution:

Whereas, ICANN has received a request for the delegation of .KP to Korea Computer Center,

Whereas, ICANN has reviewed the request, and has determined that the proposed redelegation would be in the best interest of the local and global Internet communities,

It is hereby resolved (07.74), that the proposed delegation of the .KP domain to Korea Computer Center is approved.

2011年1月18日星期二

不要痴迷于从阅读成功人士的传记中寻找经验

不要痴迷于从阅读成功人士的传记中寻找经验,这些书大部分经过精致包装,很多重要的事实不会告诉你,盖茨的的书不会告诉你他母亲是IBM董事,是她给儿子 促成了第一单大生意,巴菲特的书只会告诉你他8岁就知道去参观纽交所,但不会告诉你他国会议员的父亲带他去的,由高盛董事接待的……

专家称

专家称今冬不会出现极端雨雪冰冻灾害天气

中广网北京12月15日消息 据中国之声《新闻纵横》报道,本轮降温将持续到什么时候,未来几天全国的天气情况如何?我们连线中央气象台首席预报员何立富:

何 立富:中东部地区这股冷空气今天还会继续影响中东部地区,雨雪天气范围,主要压在淮河以南地区,江淮和湖北一带已经开始出现降雪,降雪现已经压到长江一 线。今天白天江南大部分地区以及惠州部分地区会出现降雪,由雨转成雪,一些地方可能会出现中到大雪,局地可能降雪更大,冷空气影响可能在明天趋于结束。

中国气象局新闻发言人郑江平昨晚接受中国之声专访时表示:受拉尼娜影响,今年冬天我国会出现阶段性低温,但冰冻灾害天气的可能性不大:

郑江平:受到拉尼娜气候事件的影响,今年中国会出现阶段性的低温,部分的地区也会出现雨雪冰冻的天气和影响农民的灾害,不会出现像2008年的极端的雨雪冰冻的严重的大面积的灾害。

一个月后.......

气象专家称全球暖化致极端天气 或将20年一遇

中新网1月18日电 据台湾《联合晚报》18日报道,气象专家称2010年是"极端天气年",极端现象持续到新年度,澳洲出现百年一见的大水、巴西泥石流造成670多人丧生、斯里兰卡有36万人因洪水无家可归,中国、日本、韩国都出现数十年来最低温。今冬全球极端天气层出不穷。专家指出,北半球异常天气源自北极冷风,南半球则主要受到反圣婴现象影响。世界气象组织专家警告,随着全球暖化,以往百年难得一遇的极端天气,将可能变为"20年一遇"。
气候专家指出,由于气候暖化,北极冰盖的体积近30年来减少了20%。极地海洋缺少冰层覆盖,海面相对温暖的空气就会向寒冷的高空移动,影响极地大气循环。极地冷气团不断南侵,主宰了北半球的气候。

不久前欧洲的大雪,就是因为北极冷空气引发大雪寒潮天气;影响所及,美国日前也出现连夏威夷都下雪的"异象",中国本该四季如春的贵州也出现冻雨。韩国出现96年来最低温,汉江也为之冻结。

而澳洲的水患则是反圣婴现象作祟,这次反圣婴现象从2010 年中持续至今,印度尼西亚和巴西的水患也是反圣婴的影响。

2010年已是最潮湿、最热的一年,共有18国出现史上最高温。世界气象组织专家阿斯拉尔说,计算机仿真研究显示,随着全球气候变暖,今后极端天气现象的 发生将更频繁,且强度更大,影响地区更广,例如以往100年将才出现一次的热浪,将可能变为20年出现一次。到了本世纪末,2003年欧洲夏季极端炎热, 可能不再显得很特别。